I grew up with GMT (Greenwich Mean Time,
still the legal term in the UK) which was replaced for technical
considerations by UTC (co-ordinated universal time) because the former
isn't defined specifically enough in scientific terms. UTC has become
more obvious with the rise of the computer age because time servers use
it to synchronise times between different computer systems.
WET
is apparently "Western European Time," comprising the UK, Ireland,
Portugal and a few other places - in other words, GMT, or UTC+0 in
technical terms. Presumably use of WET within the UK is at least in
part political, wishing to identify a pro-European mindset (with a
direct comparison to how different time zones are used in the US, for
example). In an international sense, using WET can only identify a
pro-European mindset, as it makes more sense to use UTC+(hour) as a)
it's already in common international usage, b) it ignores daylight
saving fluctuations - not all WET area members will be on WET at the
same time - and therefore c) it's obvious to anyone looking at
UTC+(hour) what local time it actually represents, which is really the
whole point.
The big downside to using neologistic terms like
WET, CET, EET etc. is the same as the use of the US equivalents - if you're not American, do you
know how many hours UTC differs from, say, Mountain Time? Do you even
know which areas of the US run on Mountain Time? Tell me an area uses
UTC-7 however, and I know exactly what time it is there, irrespective of
the time of year.
No comments:
Post a Comment